Nah, I wasn't serious about 'Natural Law', I was just playing.

If I were to refresh my limited reading of Aquinas I would no doubt find that I was not taking the rest of his arguments on the world as being....erm slightly more important than these fripperies.

But I do rather object to the nomenclature. 'Natural Law' seems to imply the normal state of being across nature. There ain't none, if you'll excuse me using double-negatives. Or at least there ain't none without necessary editing on the part of the folk writing it.