johnny9fingers: (Default)
johnny9fingers ([personal profile] johnny9fingers) wrote2019-11-12 03:33 pm

Well

For a contemporary example of how a formerly civilised polity can devolve into civil war, we only have to look to Hong Kong. However, in Hong Kong’s case, the externalities the polity face are rather more apparent. China has decided, rather stupidly I think, to junk the notional self-determination of the former enclave. Ye gods, empires have always needed their free ports and access to other forms of governance. We all need our political formicarium, wherein we can examine the data presented.

I had thought the Chinese to be the brightest and most intelligent of all the major polities. Now I am not so sure. When we look at the bizarre, gradual-and-step evolution of history we can all see the general direction we are headed, barring accidents.
garote: (ancient art of war china)

[personal profile] garote 2019-11-12 06:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait, you were expecting something different from an absolutely massive, barely policed, entirely self-interested bureaucracy, that controls its subjects with intimidation, censorship, and appeals to national pride?
tcpip: (Default)

[personal profile] tcpip 2019-11-13 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
> I had thought the Chinese to be the brightest and most intelligent of all the major polities.

They were certainly engaging in a perceptive and long-term strategy, which combined a totalitarian state with market economics, new wealth without new freedoms.

But there was an a potential weakness with Hong Kong. People who had a long experience of British-style liberalism, warts and all, would not make the transition and integration easy. Especially not after they had a (brief) taste of democratic elections in the 90s.
tcpip: (Default)

[personal profile] tcpip 2019-11-14 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
I suspect there will be no benefits at all, except for a small group of people who have invested for such an outcome.