Nah, I wasn't serious about 'Natural Law', I was just playing.
If I were to refresh my limited reading of Aquinas I would no doubt find that I was not taking the rest of his arguments on the world as being....erm slightly more important than these fripperies.
But I do rather object to the nomenclature. 'Natural Law' seems to imply the normal state of being across nature. There ain't none, if you'll excuse me using double-negatives. Or at least there ain't none without necessary editing on the part of the folk writing it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-02-01 11:14 pm (UTC)If I were to refresh my limited reading of Aquinas I would no doubt find that I was not taking the rest of his arguments on the world as being....erm slightly more important than these fripperies.
But I do rather object to the nomenclature. 'Natural Law' seems to imply the normal state of being across nature. There ain't none, if you'll excuse me using double-negatives. Or at least there ain't none without necessary editing on the part of the folk writing it.