Yeah. Maybe it's because I took the advertisement link out.
I just write. Mostly rant. However, there are occasions I do some high end philosophical thinking. I wonder if that accesses everything in your journal or not? Depending on the security level of my entries, some of the entries that only I or my ex's can see are pretty deep. The rating may be due to the fact I tend to write long entries on a regular basis, as opposed to how most people I've seen throw out a paragraph and leave it at that. I can't imagine this has a sophisticated system, and entry count and length would be a simple factor to judge this on.
I assume so. Or perhaps a combination of that and polysyllable usage. After all, more equals better for those that can't judge content. But this sort of result confirms me in a number of opinions.
All of these things (somehow or other they've been given the Dawkins' coined term memes) are a bit....they're done in fun, and like Dorothy L. Sayers, they do but poison in jest. But without wishing to subvert the order of things, nor even the value that I place upon learning: accessible language widens an audience. Explaining things in a way that more will understand than not is a virtue. Of course, some complex ideas cannot be explained easily, but we should do what we can.
Some memes can be quite dangerous however. Especially their pretentious cousins, dwelling in womens magazines i.e. "Is your man right for you?" And other relationship-destroying questions.
"Is your man right for you?" sounds a bit like "Did I buy the right breed of dog?" and probably reduces the criteria from personal to pseudo-objective/collective similarly. They'd find it pretty hard to put me in one of their boxes....same with you too, I reckon. Evidently I've got to hump my girlfriend's legs on a more regular basis, but to do that I've first got to find a girlfriend, and I'm none too bothered at the moment.
I like how it includes and advertisement in the results, so by posting the meme everyone is posting an ad (for a cash-advance company, no less, it seems).
I'll put a health warning on the next one: 'Borrowing from such institutions can damage your wealth, and also can, in some cases, get your legs broken.'
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 11:30 pm (UTC)Hmm.
Date: 2007-11-16 11:31 pm (UTC)Cash Advance Loans
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 09:34 am (UTC)Though I must admit, I do try to make my writing as explicit and accessible as possible: else what's the point?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 02:49 pm (UTC)I just write. Mostly rant. However, there are occasions I do some high end philosophical thinking. I wonder if that accesses everything in your journal or not? Depending on the security level of my entries, some of the entries that only I or my ex's can see are pretty deep. The rating may be due to the fact I tend to write long entries on a regular basis, as opposed to how most people I've seen throw out a paragraph and leave it at that. I can't imagine this has a sophisticated system, and entry count and length would be a simple factor to judge this on.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 09:36 am (UTC)See
no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 09:33 am (UTC)But this sort of result confirms me in a number of opinions.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-19 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-19 10:50 am (UTC)They'd find it pretty hard to put me in one of their boxes....same with you too, I reckon.
Evidently I've got to hump my girlfriend's legs on a more regular basis, but to do that I've first got to find a girlfriend, and I'm none too bothered at the moment.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-21 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 04:23 am (UTC)Get a Cash Advance
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 09:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 09:39 am (UTC)'Borrowing from such institutions can damage your wealth, and also can, in some cases, get your legs broken.'
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 12:42 pm (UTC)