![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Lovely article this morning:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/sep/01/australia-climate-scientists
(Now, why does this resonate so much with me?)
And then we have this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/sep/01/rupert-murdoch-the-australian-government
And it seems that Roops and his minions are losing the plot completely.
Now, does the panel think these two stories from Australia, when added to the phone-hacking scandal in the UK, and the ongoing investigations about misuse of shareholders funds in the US, and the US investigation into corrupt practises abroad, constitute a critical mass of bad decisions by the News Corp group? I mean, one can hope, but hope isn't certain.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/sep/01/australia-climate-scientists
(Now, why does this resonate so much with me?)
And then we have this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/sep/01/rupert-murdoch-the-australian-government
And it seems that Roops and his minions are losing the plot completely.
Now, does the panel think these two stories from Australia, when added to the phone-hacking scandal in the UK, and the ongoing investigations about misuse of shareholders funds in the US, and the US investigation into corrupt practises abroad, constitute a critical mass of bad decisions by the News Corp group? I mean, one can hope, but hope isn't certain.
