2LO 2LO 2LO....This is London Calling
Sep. 2nd, 2009 10:25 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
johnny9fingersFrom it's Reithian beginnings to its present dominance of the culture of the language of Shakespeare the BBC has always had enemies.
That James Murdoch should ally himself with those, the historical enemies of the BBC, is....understandable. However the list of enemies is as long as the list of enemies of the British state, (and its allies) or perhaps now, one or two more.
It isn't a requirement to be anti-British to hate/dislike/be in competition with the BBC but it certainly helps. After all, commecial television has always had an uneasy relationship with the BBC.
However, when it comes to the dissemination of High Culture and ideas associated with such, the BBC is without equal.
For example BBC_Radio_3
Radio 3 is the world's most significant most significant commissioner of new music*.
And as for BBC_Radio_4, for most Englishfolk who listen to radio, it needs no introduction.
Apart from sponsoring and organising arguably the largest and greatest music festival in the world (The_Proms) and funding some six orchestras plus choirs, the national levy that goes to the BBC pays for a lot more than just TV without the adverts.
Y'see Murdoch is in some ways right: the BBC is a monolith, but if he's setting up NewsCorp as the alternative then he really is on a hiding to nothing. Without the BBC, stations with editorial agenda like FOX would have their say with no major dissent: few others apart from the BBC have the resources and editorial and journalistic integrity to present a story as free of bias. Most private newsgathering organisations are answerable to the whims of their owners. Because the BBC is payed for by public money, established with a Royal Charter, and subject to the scrutiny of its board of governors, Parliament, and ultimately the people, it wouldn't be allowed to get away with some of the egregious (or some would say deliberate) errors FOX's output is strewn with. Republican sex scandal Senators being labeled Dems for example; never mind the network's OxyContin-driven commentary that substitutes for journalism, unnoticed by its audience.
Yeah, criticise our health service and we'll get up in arms. Set about the beeb and....upon reflection, the consequences could be worse: folk will start looking at the alternatives, and then people like me will start taking collections and buying two or more TV licences every year. I may leave money to the BBC in my will, or try to covenant money to it in some way or other. And really, I don't care if the Murdoch organisation goes out of business, despite the TLS. In fact, that may even be a win. Newspapers have had their day, perhaps private broadcasters like FOX won't be far behind. I'm sure some will mourn their passing: thinking about it even Al Megrahi will have some mourners at his funeral, too.
*Source wikipedia, so it may not be gospel, but I'd lay odds on it being correct.
That James Murdoch should ally himself with those, the historical enemies of the BBC, is....understandable. However the list of enemies is as long as the list of enemies of the British state, (and its allies) or perhaps now, one or two more.
It isn't a requirement to be anti-British to hate/dislike/be in competition with the BBC but it certainly helps. After all, commecial television has always had an uneasy relationship with the BBC.
However, when it comes to the dissemination of High Culture and ideas associated with such, the BBC is without equal.
For example BBC_Radio_3
Radio 3 is the world's most significant most significant commissioner of new music*.
And as for BBC_Radio_4, for most Englishfolk who listen to radio, it needs no introduction.
Apart from sponsoring and organising arguably the largest and greatest music festival in the world (The_Proms) and funding some six orchestras plus choirs, the national levy that goes to the BBC pays for a lot more than just TV without the adverts.
Y'see Murdoch is in some ways right: the BBC is a monolith, but if he's setting up NewsCorp as the alternative then he really is on a hiding to nothing. Without the BBC, stations with editorial agenda like FOX would have their say with no major dissent: few others apart from the BBC have the resources and editorial and journalistic integrity to present a story as free of bias. Most private newsgathering organisations are answerable to the whims of their owners. Because the BBC is payed for by public money, established with a Royal Charter, and subject to the scrutiny of its board of governors, Parliament, and ultimately the people, it wouldn't be allowed to get away with some of the egregious (or some would say deliberate) errors FOX's output is strewn with. Republican sex scandal Senators being labeled Dems for example; never mind the network's OxyContin-driven commentary that substitutes for journalism, unnoticed by its audience.
Yeah, criticise our health service and we'll get up in arms. Set about the beeb and....upon reflection, the consequences could be worse: folk will start looking at the alternatives, and then people like me will start taking collections and buying two or more TV licences every year. I may leave money to the BBC in my will, or try to covenant money to it in some way or other. And really, I don't care if the Murdoch organisation goes out of business, despite the TLS. In fact, that may even be a win. Newspapers have had their day, perhaps private broadcasters like FOX won't be far behind. I'm sure some will mourn their passing: thinking about it even Al Megrahi will have some mourners at his funeral, too.
*Source wikipedia, so it may not be gospel, but I'd lay odds on it being correct.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-09-02 02:35 pm (UTC)Hope you're well & happy - and 'er indoors too.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-02 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-02 04:07 pm (UTC)I just wish he and NewsCorp would up and die a horrible flaming death.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-02 09:27 pm (UTC)In my opinion, Rupe really was the Henry VIIIth of media Barons. I'm slightly surprised he didn't include the traditional collection of a British title on the way*; but then again, he did have a bust of Karl Marx in his university rooms at Worcester College, Oxford. (This is common knowledge at Worcester, apparently.)
*Like Lords Beaverbrook, Black, etc & etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 03:57 pm (UTC)But (not)seriously, who would have ever thought a Rupes would have ever been so lucky as to have a women allow him to touch her?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 07:42 pm (UTC)