Two Things

May. 28th, 2012 08:35 am
johnny9fingers: (Default)
Interesting Guardian editorial today:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/27/eurozone-crisis-christine-lagarde-morality-tale

Obviously it's all the fault of the undeserving poor. They have brought us to this state with their health care needs and pensions. Now we must wait for the noble bankers to help us out of our misery with their graciousness. 


This was followed by a revelation that BoJo's former communications chief, Guto Harri, an ex-BBC man himself, threatened the Beeb over an interview with a biographer of the philandering Mayor of London:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/27/guto-harri-press-campaign-against-bbc

Harri is a man who has championed the integrity of NewsCorp.

Ye gods above.

It's one thing the Beeb nursing folk like Jeremy Clarkson, whose neo-libertarian views can rightly be regarded as the comic outpourings of a deluded tosspot with a vocabulary considerably more extensive than his understanding: but when they start nurturing folk like Harri you really have to wonder if, within the very environs of Broadcasting House itself, there isn't some secret self-destructive inner cabal working strenuously for the beeb's demise: undermining from within, as some sort of "fifth column".

Never mind, when Roops has persuaded the Tories to dismantle the BBC and asset strip the bits, and all we shall be left with is pay-per-view and Fox, maybe we can download everything we want to watch from the bit-torrent sites. Of course, by then we shall have no in-depth unbiased news reporting, or analysis: but what do the common folk need of such fripperies when they're holding down two or three jobs just to pay the rent? That is if they can find two or three jobs…or even one.

You see, it is my contention that, in the media, a strong private sector needs a strong state sector to balance it. Each keeps the other virtuous. Some of the lunatics who call themselves conservatives would get rid of the Beeb - the world's oldest national broadcasting organisation. How precisely are these folk "conservative" I wonder, if they are prepared to throw the Beeb under a bus to conform to some bizarre ideological notion of the limitations of government. As for the Harri chappy he comes across as being a bit distastefully Judas-like, which in the modern world is no doubt "realistic" or "sexy".

Bah humbug. You shall get the media you deserve, no doubt. And hopefully I will be dead by then.

Sing if you love the oligarchy.

The best things in life are free,
But you can keep 'em for the birds and the bees...


johnny9fingers: (Default)
The Wall Street Journal has commented on the ongoing News International/News Corp crisis in the UK:

online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303661904576451812776293184.html

Now, in a nice attempt at spin, News Corp's premier US newspaper weighed in, essentially accusing the Guardian and the BBC of attempting to influence public affairs.

"The idea that the BBC and the Guardian newspaper aren't attempting to influence public affairs, and don't skew their coverage to do so, can't stand a day's scrutiny."

Er....pot calling the kettle black, by any chance?

Nevertheless, it seems that this is going to be the standard News Corp line from here on in: that this is all a storm in a teacup, blown out of all proportion by left-wing competitors eager to do News Corp down.

Then we have the idea that payments for information are normal practice.

"Applying this standard to British tabloids could turn payments made as part of traditional news-gathering into criminal acts. The Wall Street Journal doesn't pay sources for information, but the practice is common elsewhere in the press, including in the U.S."

The beauty of this piece from the WSJ is that it was slightly behind the events. This came before Sir Paul Stephenson, the most senior police officer in the UK, resigned. That News International/News Corp papers have suborned the Metropolitan police is the real story here. Illegal phone hacking is admittedly a crime, but not one on the scale of buying the Met to do News Corp bidding: which is something even The Times (another News Corp/News International paper) is prepared to admit.

"The public may be disgusted by illegal and immoral practices among tabloid journalists, and dismayed by the thought of politicians unbalanced by the urge to keep the favour of newspaper executives. At the point at which this sorry tale touches the police, however, it becomes frightening. Unless a huge amount of what has been alleged these past two weeks is sheer fiction, Britain's police are riven with corruption on an institutional scale. Journalists who bribe policemen are indicative of a flawed industry. Policemen who can be bribed are indicative of a flawed state."

Actually, this is slightly disingenuous. Journalists who bribe policemen are criminal, as are policemen who allow themselves to be bribed. And given, in this flawed world, that it appears everyone has his or her price, it is not breathtakingly amazing that coppers have sold information, or had freebies for favours returned. What is true is that some organisations are ready and willing to exploit the rampant materialism of the times to get what they want, and then cover up their wrongdoing with misdirection. But it is criminal: a de facto crime in the UK since the beginning of the 20th Century.

However, all of this may be only the start of Roops problems, because:

www.channel4.com/news/preliminary-inquiry-into-news-international-by-fraud-office

'The former minister Tom Watson, wrote to the SFO's Director urging him to investigate alleged breaches of Company Law at News International, relating to payments made after the phone hacking scandal. He said the payments were a "gross misuse of shareholders' money".'

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/17/murdoch-phone-hacking-america-news-corp

This may be the thing that Murdoch cannot evade, even if he can twist and turn his way out of all of the other accusations made against him and his family run (but not entirely family owned) business: misuse of shareholders' money.
johnny9fingers: (Default)


www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14112097
 

www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jul/11/phone-hacking-news-international-gordon-brown

If true, the News Corporation scandal has just taken another turn. I quote:

On the reports on Fraser Brown having cystic fibrosis, the Brown family believe only medical staff treating their son had access to the records, and are worried they may have been accessed illegally.

A well-placed source has told the BBC that in 2006 when she was editor of the Sun, Rebekah Brooks called the Browns to inform them she knew that their son Fraser had the condition.

Friends of the Browns say the call caused them immense distress, since they were only coming to terms with the diagnosis, which had not been confirmed.


Cameron and Brown share the pain of having a child with serious illness. If someone had accessed the records of Cameron's son's illness, I would have thought that, had positions been reversed, Brown would have investigated this properly and Murdoch's empire would be liable to some sort of punitive response. And I think that Cameron is a big enough chap, and a decent enough man, to ensure that this revelation doesn't get away lightly.

I am now of the opinion that News Corporation's UK goose may well be cooked.

Profile

johnny9fingers: (Default)
johnny9fingers

June 2021

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 09:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios