johnny9fingers: (Default)
My short-sightedness has been interfering with my reading habits for a small time now. Nevertheless, between infant heir, SWMBO, etc., I have found the odd moment or two. However, my myopia (a sign of age, no doubt) particularly impacts upon my enjoyment of this book:






The prints, from Gilray, Rowlandson, Cruickshank et al are brilliant examples of what we now consider "political cartoons", and Gatrell's commentary, presented with a sort of pastor-like oratorical didacticism, is illuminating and insightful: and sets a tone which, if not quite Olympian, nor even Augustan, still treats the subject of often bawdy levity with a gravitas wonderfully oxymoronic, as if trying to imbue it with dignity. And he makes sense doing so.

I'd give it an extravagant 9.25 out of 10. If you are at all interested in the history of political cartoons, this gives a selection from a time and place at the nascency of the artform.


johnny9fingers: (Default)
This evening I went to SWMBO offices where there was a talk on Faberge by Geoffrey Munn. Various nobs and important folk were there, and Mr Munn himself was pretty illuminating on the subjects of lapidary stuff and the languages of stones and flowers. We spoke for a bit and I found out that he had known of one of my godfathers, who by chance had also known the Queen Mum (RIP). Nice chap, as it happens, though I hadn't known of him from his appearances on the Antiques Roadshow. I mingled with the various lords and ladies and the odd oligarch or twain, before the wife and I took a cab back to the depths of East Dulwich. Apparently I'm a 'social asset', being rather well connected and prepared to talk to anyone.

And still I'm too damn commie for all of this. Even Mr Munn opined that the massive inequalities of the late Victorian and Edwardian period were the basis of Faberge and Cartier's ability to produce such high-value objects of craft and art, and was content that such times had passed. These days Imperial Faberge Eggs are valued at some £20M and rising: which is some Easter gift. Though I might just covet a Faberge cigarette case to put my spliffs in, I doubt whether either I or Madame could afford such a luxury: and even if I could, I doubt that I'd ever spend quite so much on an item quite so trivial, especially when there are starving children, if not on my doorstep, then not more than a couple of thousand miles away.

Luxuria was originally one of the seven deadly sins. What happened to change this?
johnny9fingers: (Default)

In what has memorably been called 'The_short_twentieth_century' the arts flourished in new ways. Narrative found new avenues for exposition; new media developed.

I suppose we ought to set the frame (and I quote pretty much the entirety of the wiki entry)

The short twentieth century
, defined by Eric Hobsbawm, a British Marxist historian and author, refers to the period between the years 1914 and 1991.
That period begins with the beginning of World War I, and ends with the fall of the Soviet Union. These events represented such significant changes in world history as to redefine the era.

Anyway, Marxist historians aside (however memorable their coinage) the questions posed are thus: what are the greatest and most important works of art (or architecture) of any kind in the 20th Century. What things ought we to know of? What would we show some hypothetical alien cultural historian?

Seventeen years on we have had some small time to reflect, and we are also limited by the time-frame: so we just miss Stravinsky's 'Rite of Spring'.

The usual suspects would be likely to include the populist clichés, so here's a dozen to start the ball rolling:

Four_Quartets
Voodoo_Child (slight return)
Guernica
Fallingwater
Ulysses
The_Seventh_Seal
Side Two of Abbey_Road
Strauss's Four_Last_Songs
Bartok's String_Quartet_No._3
The_Wasteland
The Sydney_Opera_House
Citizen_Kane

johnny9fingers: (Sri Yantra)
LJ goes down, I'm without my fix. If I were only more non-rational about things I could imagine it to be a conspiracy to deprive me of my particular pleasures. Being rational, however, I know I'm in the waiting room phase of life.
Still to come:
Colostomy
Prostate problems
Impotence
Zimmer frame
Altzheimer's
Parkinson's
Increasing myopia and then darkness
Cardiac Arrythmia

All avoided so far.
Still hetrosexual despite aversion therapy (Women...ARgh...Women...Arghh! dumbstruck by a combination of anger and confusion our hero beats himself about head with clicky ba' resulting in the normal concussion experienced by having anything emotional to do with the enemy gender - I know what they've done to me in the past, so I might as well beat myself up first, at least I'll be on the winning side.)

I still wonder why women prefer thugs to gentlemen. One forgets just what a turn off manners and courtesy are to the modern woman, or at least the modern women who, for some unknown reasons, I find attractive. My chum Hazel reckons its all self-selecting - I choose the mad ones because I need something to complain about, or in some unexplained way, the madness is the sexy bit. I'm beginning to dislike my subconscious in the same way that one begins to dislike a drinking companion who, though good fun, leads one into increasingly embarassing situations, like attending a society wedding with Courtney Love as one's date. 'Wax my anus', indeed. (Represses slight shudder - can you actually imagine shouting that to your PA down a busy London street? I know rock'n'roll folk are meant to be a bit OTT, but couldn't she just be a bit more tasteful, like Keef for instance.)

The Old Man's a bit weak today. He has spent lots of it in bed. Finishing up his 4th bout of Chemo, and right at the nadir of the cycle. Mother has local ward meetings and selection committee stuff to do and I have to be about for Dad until our sitting MP has been reselected or not. Doesn't affect me - I resigned from the Party over the war, so I don't get a say anymore - perhaps impotence has come earlier than I anticipated.

Again lifted by news from across the pond. Think the US will get its act together and do something about present situation. I have faith that now many of the issues are being openly discussed, spin will count less in forming the US electorate's opinions - even Fox News got a visit from R Murdoch (prop). Will not expect Volte Face from Fox, but if Roops is agin the war and the Republican position, then its bye-bye both houses, hello lame duck President.

My family have fought in the military for a very long time. One member was (famously) Wellington's ADC at Waterloo. One (a member of the British Upper house) died at the Somme. Both my Father and his elder brother fought during WWII, my uncle being mentioned in dispatches for work behind the lines in what is now called Iraq - he lost the sight in one eye and was physically broken by the ordeal. My brother and I are the first generation not to have served their country in over 200 years, and I used to wonder if I should have continued with a family tradition. Feel v.glad I didn't. I think it's different with conscription and von Clauswitz's concept of total war, or defensive war.
Which is of course why in any contest between defensive war, which is Athene's province, and invasion or aggressive war, which is Ares': Athene almost always wins...eventually.

Profile

johnny9fingers: (Default)
johnny9fingers

June 2021

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 09:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios