(no subject)

[johnny9fingers]

Came across this:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/16/sciencenews?gusrc=rss&feed=science

All I can say is chaps in England must have some of the most genetically damaged sperm in the world.....'cause almost no-one in a relationship in England manages daily sex: it's more along the lines of whenever Madame can fit it into her schedule/can be bothered/hasn't a headache. I hope that the chaps across the pond get a better deal.
Still not gay yet.....but I'm certainly ambivalent enough towards the enemy gender to encourage change. I don't suppose gay folk worry too much about the potential damage to their child fathering capabilities, and I should be too old to care. 

Also, it appears being gay maybe genetic:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071016/ap_on_sc/gay_genetics_6;_ylt=AqpOM38y0nDH0bl9EEMvm6uEDvII

So my attempts to change my orientation (because, after all I'd rather be one of the sinners than the self-righteous, smug, bigoted wankers for whom heaven sets such arbitary rules) may be impossible.
If being gay is genetically determined, the religions that claim they know the mind of God are going to have to eat an awful lot of humble pie.
I reckon a barefoot pilgrimage to Jerusalem might just about cover the penance for individual homophobia....but as for the collective sin of the churches....

We could always burn the homophobic preachers and pastors....there's the chair too.

I'm becoming zero tolerant. And it makes me happy. Some mornings it's a damn good job I don't wake up in a country that has legal guns.

Comments

[e4q.livejournal.com]

i'm usually right. but i don't think that's what kills the sex off. because i am also massively easygoing and agreeable and not argumentative. (just right)