G spot, I see no G spot....Because you're blind in one eye, you stupid ass.

[johnny9fingers]

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/20080220/tsc-science-women-sex-718400e_1.html

One is almost tempted into the overuse of heavy irony here and say "quelle surprise". I wonder again about the differences between nature and nurture.
We are a diverse species and our diversity is a good thing: it enables us to fit into many evolutionary niches, which, as we are top predator and scavenger as well, give us good chances of survival. We are adaptable. We are also stupid, hidebound, and given to sloth and fouling our own nests (mainly because we regard it as cheaper to let someone else clear up after us).
But the folk who have, over the years, told women what they should and shouldn't be thinking and feeling; and what constituted 'normal' behaviour and sexuality (mainly men, it has to be said), have been talking through their arses, where there appears to be no G-spot as yet discovered (unless you ask an homosexual man - some of whom will tell you different). Perhaps all these folk telling women this stuff just had something to prove, or perhaps hide....

What is interesting is this may revive the old debate about vaginal orgasms and Freud. It may also irritate some feminists, but I hope not.

Comments

[johnny9fingers.livejournal.com]

Weed is more debauched than alcohol. Which is another plus.

[tripinthehead33.livejournal.com]

*nods* Indeed. I have to wonder, did these folks bother testing other holes for fun points at all?

[johnny9fingers.livejournal.com]

Doubt it: I think the exploration was confined to the obvious.

I have known a woman who claimed to be able to orgasm from the stroking of her breasts. I didn't (to my subsequent chagrin) investigate further, given at the time I was otherwise engaged; but the notion lives in memory as a possibility.

Now where's my damme peacock feather?

[tripinthehead33.livejournal.com]

Its possible with certain women, I can attest to that. There is a variation in sensitivity, the girl in question liked to say it was the smaller they were, the more sensitive they were. *shrugs* It would make sense, technically, if there was no variation in the nervous system set up, and there were more nerve endings per square inch I suppose.